Global Warming--Caught Red-handed

I hate to say it, but I told you so.

The "consensus of global warming experts" is now exposed for the sham that it is. Internal documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia expose the falsification of data and the 'cherry picking' of data that the Unit used to 'cook the books' on global warming.

They claim that we don't understand the subtle interplay among experts during the study process. That's simple hogwash.

The scientific method involves obtaining and organizing data to support a hypothesis, but it does not condone selecting only the data that supports the hypothesis. Nor does it allow adjusting or adding data to support the hypothesis. Nor does is involve hiding data or preventing the publication of data that does not support the process. But the members of the "global warming consensus" have apparently committed all of these sins.

When we look at all of the data, we will see that climate change is occurring. There is no conclusive proof however, that mankind is causing it, or can alter it.

But that reality does not keep us from doing the right things: conserving water, using less energy, reducing our use of fossil fuels, preserving and restoring the rain forests, and on and on. We should do all of these things for our own good, and for the good of the planet, not because the 'global warming' crew is trying to scare us into doing them.