Monday, July 18, 2011

Taxes, Taxes, Taxes

The Democrats tell me, "Tax the rich people."
The Republicans tell me, "No new taxes."
It would seem there is no middle ground, no compromise. But I believe that there is a middle ground. I just look at the facts and "loosen" the definition of 'new taxes.'
First, some facts, quoted from Bruce Bartlett at NYTimes.com:
  • 46 per cent of tax filers pay no federal income taxes.
  • 78,000 households with incomes of $211,000 to $533,000 will pay no income taxes this year.
  • 24,000 filers with incomes of $533,000 to $2.2 million will also pay zero.
  • 3,000 filers with incomes of over $2.2 million will also pay zero.
  • Many households with incomes under the median income could, by foregoing some luxuries, afford to pay a small tax.
  • Finally, I read elsewhere that 67% of American Corporations pay no federal taxes--I am sure that not all of those are without profit of some kind.
Let's make it clear: I do not feel the need to extract tax from a household that does not make, or barely makes, sufficient income to house and feed themselves and transport themselves to work. Likewise, I do not believe that a business that lost money, or did not make a net profit before taxes, should be forced to pay. But the folks who are paying their taxes are paying as much as 25%, or more, of their income, and so probably should most of those 105,000 filers who plan to pay none.
I said I want to 'loosen' a definition. By that I mean I do not accept the position of some conservatives that the elimination of an existing tax credit, loophole, or federal subsidy constitutes a new tax. We should be able to eliminate loopholes. A company that makes a multi-million dollar profit after taxes does not need loopholes, tax credits or subsidies to stay in business.
So, as I see it, the middle ground is to close as many as possible loopholes in the code, and eliminate tax credits and federal subsides for businesses that can make a profit without them.
There are 105,00 households and many corporations out there that need to step up and pay their fair share of the federal taxes that are already part of the law. It probably is not enough to balance the budget, but it would help significantly. Our legislative and executive branches of government need to look at it this way, and act accordingly.

1 comment:

Poochie Williamson said...

The number in the last paragraph should be 105,000, not 102,00. Although Blogger let me edit it, the 'publish button' did not work.